I received news about this shocking case from UK group, Christian Concern. Yet again, we see a tragic example of how same-sex legislation and equality fascism is stifling discussion and penalising those who hold views once unthinkingly accepted as mainstream, and now deemed beyond the pale. I hope and pray that this poor lady receive justice and the government acts to provide clearer guidelines for these kinds of cases.
A Christian teaching assistant who was disciplined for expressing her beliefs about sexual ethics and the meaning of the rainbow, will today ask an Employment Tribunal to overturn the action taken against her.
Last year, Vicky Allen, who is being supported by the Christian Legal Centre, was asked by a pupil with special educational needs whether she thought that same sex relationships were “OK”.
Minutes later, the 14-year-old asked whether Vicky thought that the meaning of the rainbow symbol had changed.
Vicky answered both questions in line with her Christian beliefs, but was later investigated by school authorities and given a 12-month written warning.
“He asked me what I believed, so I told him my biblical beliefs. He asked me out of the blue,” Vicky explains.
Commenting on the effect of the action taken against her, she says: “I felt like a criminal – it was unbelievable. It’s taken away any trust I had.”
Vicky says that she is challenging the school’s behaviour so that other Christians will not be penalised simply for answering questions based on their biblical beliefs.
Andrea Williams (of Christian Concern) commented: “This is another example of a Christian being penalised for expressing Christian beliefs in the context of their work. It’s important for the future of gospel freedoms, that we challenge such censorship.
“Imagine if those who voted ‘remain’ in the recent referendum were told that they could no longer express their viewpoint because the referendum favoured ‘Brexit!'”
Vicky who has extensive experience of working with special educational needs students, says that she is used to receiving direct, and sometimes personal, questions from the students. These have included, for example, questions about her Christian faith and how she spends her weekends.
She says that answering such questions is an important part of building good relationships with the students, which in turn helps them to learn.
The student, with whom Vicky had worked for four years, asked about same-sex relationships during an English class. He had asked her about the issue in the past, and Vicky explained that she believes what the Bible teaches about relationships between men and women, and doesn’t think that same-sex relationships are right.
A few minutes later, in another direct question, the pupil asked whether the meaning of the rainbow symbol had changed, given what they had been discussing. Incidentally, this is a very perceptive question and something a connection I’d never made before.
Vicky replied, explaining her own belief that the rainbow speaks of God’s promise that he will not flood the earth again but that some people have given it a different meaning, reflecting their own message.
The student also asked whether she believed what the pope believes. Vicky, who attends a Pentecostal church, said that she did not.
The pupil then apologised for asking the questions and the lesson continued.
Vicky detected no sign that the boy was upset or distressed by the answers that she gave.
Opposition to equal opportunities?
That evening, however, his mother reported the conversation to the school. She did not make a formal complaint but asked that the matter be investigated.
In an interview with Vicky and the student, the boy said that he did not feel “offended” by Vicky’s answers, but agreed with a teacher’s suggestion that he may have felt “uneasy”.
Following the investigation, the head teacher started disciplinary action against Vicky, which resulted in a 12-month written warning for “acting in opposition to the school’s expectations with regard to equal opportunities” and for comments that “were not in line with both the policies and ethos of a member of staff”. Vicky appealed the warning but in December last year, the school’s governors upheld the decision.
Vicky, who has spent her career in education, says that she felt ostracised and let down by staff, and that her morale and motivation has suffered.
Although the warning has now expired, Vicky is challenging the school’s decision so as to help protect Christians in similar situations.
Another example of government betrayal
During the hearing, Vicky is expected to highlight assurances given by the Education Secretary during the passage of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act through Parliament.
In response to questioning during a Public Bill Committee hearing in February 2013, the then Education Secretary, Michael Gove, said: “But any teacher, if asked direct or invited to share his view by a parent or a student, is perfectly at liberty to say, with equal marriage—as with adultery, divorce or abortion—what their own moral view might be.”
I’m very pleased to report that there has been progress for Vicky Allen and that a settlement has been reached. The school’s statement is as follows:
“Victoria Allen and the Governing Body of Brannel School are pleased to announce that the employment dispute between Victoria Allen and Brannel School is now concluded.
The parties accept that some people have deeply held views about the nature of marriage, and that every individual has the freedom to express these in accordance with the law. The School also respects that Victoria Allen’s view that marriage should be between a man and a woman is sincerely held and shared by many others.
Andy Edmonds, the Head teacher, has recognised Victoria Allen’s right to share her Christian beliefs with students and has apologised for any upset that Victoria Allen may have felt during the disciplinary process.
Victoria Allen has accepted that it is reasonable for the school to request that staff share balanced views with students when asked questions of their personal beliefs and opinion under the requirements of equalities legislation including the Equality Act 2010 and the Education Act 1996.
The parties uphold the rights and freedoms of other members of society based on the principles of a democratic society.
Both parties reaffirm their commitment to the long-standing British values of freedom of religion, freedom of speech and freedom of association with mutual respect for the dignity and rights and freedoms of others, including the right of Victoria Allen to express her views.
Both parties are happy to work with each other going forward to secure a continuing healthy working environment in the School.”